{"id":1062,"date":"2022-09-15T12:29:02","date_gmt":"2022-09-15T10:29:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/?p=1062"},"modified":"2024-07-12T11:56:01","modified_gmt":"2024-07-12T09:56:01","slug":"irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/en\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/","title":{"rendered":"Misleading health-related advertising for a medical product"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"content_row row vc_row wpb_row  default-style fullwidth\">\n\t\n\t<div class=\"content_row_wrapper  default\">\n\t<div class=\"vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column vc_column_container rt-column-container\">\n\t<div class=\"vc_column-inner rt-column-inner\">\n\t\t<div class=\"wpb_wrapper rt-wrapper\">\n\t\t\t\n\t<div class=\"wpb_text_column wpb_content_element\" >\n\t\t<div class=\"wpb_wrapper\">\n\t\t\t<p><strong>OLG Hamm, judgment of 21.4.2022, 4 U 39\/22 - Misleading health-related advertising for a medical product.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><i>The so-called \"strict principle\" is applied to protect consumers not only in the case of health-related advertising for pharmaceutical products, but also when medical products which only have a physical effect and are not absorbed by the body (here: a wound dressing for absorbing and binding wound exudate) are advertised as having healing effects (following OLG Frankfurt, judgment of 2.12.2021 - 6 U 121\/20, GRUR 2022, 581 - Healing earth for detoxification).<br \/>\nThe decisive factor for the question of whether the advertising claims contain health-related effect claims is the understanding of the averagely informed, attentive and reasonable advertising addressee (following BGH, judgment of 5.11.2020 - I ZR 204\/19, GRUR 2021, 513 - Sinupret).<br \/>\nIf the addressees of the advertising statements belong to different circles (here: medical professionals, but also the general public), misleading one of these circles is sufficient (following BGH, decision of February 11, 2010 - I ZR 154\/08, WRP 2010, 759 - Bundesdruckerei and judgment of October 2, 2003 - I ZR 150\/01, GRUR 2004, 244 - Marktf\u00fchrerschaft).<br \/>\n<\/i><br \/>\nThe scope of application to infected wounds and with references to clinical studies as well as the term inflammation was misleading and violated the advertising guidelines for medical devices, as not only professionals but also the general public were addressed.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Famxe.net%2F91pt6x9j-bkprgtuq-dwb5ye0m-g4k&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cjhb%40lawpoint.at%7Ca7b56c82a9064ca374fb08da9167f307%7C09b6985c9df341ada278d192336a556f%7C1%7C0%7C637982172887077020%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=dBjKAjv6qLZWxF%2BVYuzZxceEAna%2FxN27zV2Q7ByRQ4M%3D&amp;reserved=0\">Click here to read the decision!<\/a><\/p>\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<div  class=\"content_row row vc_row wpb_row  default-style fullwidth\">\n\t\n\t<div class=\"content_row_wrapper  default\">\n\t<div class=\"vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column vc_column_container rt-column-container\">\n\t<div class=\"vc_column-inner rt-column-inner\">\n\t\t<div class=\"wpb_wrapper rt-wrapper\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"button_wrapper  arrow rounded\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/kontakt\/\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Do you have any questions? Contact us!\" class=\"button_  style-1 medium rt-5975837\"><span><span>Do you have any questions? Contact us!<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"OLG Hamm, Urteil vom 21.04.2022, 4 U 39\/22 \u2013 Irref\u00fchrende gesundheitsbezogene Werbung f\u00fcr ein Medizinprodukt. Das sog. \u201eStrengeprinzip\u201c kommt zum Schutz der Verbraucher nicht nur bei gesundheitsbezogener Werbung f\u00fcr Arzneimittel zur Anwendung, sondern auch, wenn Medizinprodukte, welche nur physikalisch wirken und nicht vom K\u00f6rper resorbiert werden (hier: eine Wundauflage zur Aufnahme und Bindung von Wundexsudat), [...]","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1063,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1062","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-life-sciences"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Irref\u00fchrende gesundheitsbezogene Werbung f\u00fcr ein Medizinprodukt<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Ein spannendes Urteil des OLG Hamm, vom 21.4.2022, 4 U 39\/22 zum Thema irref\u00fchrende gesundheitsbezogene Werbung f\u00fcr ein Medizinprodukt.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/en\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Irref\u00fchrende gesundheitsbezogene Werbung f\u00fcr ein Medizinprodukt\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Ein spannendes Urteil des OLG Hamm, vom 21.4.2022, 4 U 39\/22 zum Thema irref\u00fchrende gesundheitsbezogene Werbung f\u00fcr ein Medizinprodukt.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/en\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"lawpoint\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-09-15T10:29:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-12T09:56:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/pexels-ron-lach-9769116-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1707\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"lawpoint Rechtsanw\u00e4lte\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"lawpoint Rechtsanw\u00e4lte\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"lawpoint Rechtsanw\u00e4lte\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/#\/schema\/person\/735204fbd5e0d14a6fa79fc8d742e941\"},\"headline\":\"Irref\u00fchrende gesundheitsbezogene Werbung f\u00fcr ein Medizinprodukt\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-09-15T10:29:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-12T09:56:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/\"},\"wordCount\":426,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/pexels-ron-lach-9769116-scaled.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Life Sciences\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/\",\"name\":\"Irref\u00fchrende gesundheitsbezogene Werbung f\u00fcr ein Medizinprodukt\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/pexels-ron-lach-9769116-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-09-15T10:29:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-12T09:56:01+00:00\",\"description\":\"Ein spannendes Urteil des OLG Hamm, vom 21.4.2022, 4 U 39\/22 zum Thema irref\u00fchrende gesundheitsbezogene Werbung f\u00fcr ein Medizinprodukt.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/pexels-ron-lach-9769116-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/pexels-ron-lach-9769116-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1707,\"caption\":\"Medizinprodukte\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Irref\u00fchrende gesundheitsbezogene Werbung f\u00fcr ein Medizinprodukt\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/\",\"name\":\"lawpoint\",\"description\":\"We get to the point.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/#organization\",\"name\":\"lawpoint\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/logo_lawpoint_cmyk_zusatz_rechts_mehr-Arbeitsflaeche.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/logo_lawpoint_cmyk_zusatz_rechts_mehr-Arbeitsflaeche.png\",\"width\":888,\"height\":448,\"caption\":\"lawpoint\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/#\/schema\/person\/735204fbd5e0d14a6fa79fc8d742e941\",\"name\":\"lawpoint Rechtsanw\u00e4lte\",\"description\":\"kanzlei@lawpoint.at\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Misleading health-related advertising for a medical product","description":"Ein spannendes Urteil des OLG Hamm, vom 21.4.2022, 4 U 39\/22 zum Thema irref\u00fchrende gesundheitsbezogene Werbung f\u00fcr ein Medizinprodukt.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/en\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Irref\u00fchrende gesundheitsbezogene Werbung f\u00fcr ein Medizinprodukt","og_description":"Ein spannendes Urteil des OLG Hamm, vom 21.4.2022, 4 U 39\/22 zum Thema irref\u00fchrende gesundheitsbezogene Werbung f\u00fcr ein Medizinprodukt.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/en\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/","og_site_name":"lawpoint","article_published_time":"2022-09-15T10:29:02+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-12T09:56:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1707,"url":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/pexels-ron-lach-9769116-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"lawpoint Rechtsanw\u00e4lte","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"lawpoint Rechtsanw\u00e4lte","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/"},"author":{"name":"lawpoint Rechtsanw\u00e4lte","@id":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/#\/schema\/person\/735204fbd5e0d14a6fa79fc8d742e941"},"headline":"Irref\u00fchrende gesundheitsbezogene Werbung f\u00fcr ein Medizinprodukt","datePublished":"2022-09-15T10:29:02+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-12T09:56:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/"},"wordCount":426,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/pexels-ron-lach-9769116-scaled.jpg","articleSection":["Life Sciences"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/","url":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/","name":"Misleading health-related advertising for a medical product","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/pexels-ron-lach-9769116-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2022-09-15T10:29:02+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-12T09:56:01+00:00","description":"Ein spannendes Urteil des OLG Hamm, vom 21.4.2022, 4 U 39\/22 zum Thema irref\u00fchrende gesundheitsbezogene Werbung f\u00fcr ein Medizinprodukt.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/pexels-ron-lach-9769116-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/pexels-ron-lach-9769116-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":1707,"caption":"Medizinprodukte"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/irrefuehrende-gesundheitsbezogene-werbung-medizinprodukt\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Irref\u00fchrende gesundheitsbezogene Werbung f\u00fcr ein Medizinprodukt"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/","name":"lawpoint","description":"We get to the point.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/#organization","name":"lawpoint","url":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/logo_lawpoint_cmyk_zusatz_rechts_mehr-Arbeitsflaeche.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/logo_lawpoint_cmyk_zusatz_rechts_mehr-Arbeitsflaeche.png","width":888,"height":448,"caption":"lawpoint"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/#\/schema\/person\/735204fbd5e0d14a6fa79fc8d742e941","name":"lawpoint Rechtsanw\u00e4lte","description":"kanzlei@lawpoint.at","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1062","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1062"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1062\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1245,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1062\/revisions\/1245"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1063"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1062"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1062"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawpoint.at\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1062"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}